Translate

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Libya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libya. Show all posts

Friday, November 20, 2020

US Senators Oppose Sale Of F-35 Jets To UAE

Three U.S. senators have launched a campaign to block the sale of top-of-the-line F-35 jets to the United Arab Emirates, raising concerns over the deal, which is seen as a gift to the UAE for recognizing Israel ۔

According to the International Media, even if the three senators persuade a majority in Congress to oppose the 23 billion package, they will face a mountain of obstacles like the veto power of US President Donald Trump.

Democrat Senator Chris Murphy, a close ally of US President-elect Joe Biden, pointed to reports that the UAE had violated previous terms of sale that weapons sent to the US ally had been recovered from war-torn Libya and Yemen.

Friday, October 23, 2020

Today Top News Stories || US Election Last Presidential Debate, Trump Called India Dirty, Filthy And Useless | Sudan Establish Relations With Israel | Visit Israel Without A Visa | Boycott Turkish Products | A Permanent Ceasefire | Second Marriage & Get 10 Millions | Airstrike Kills 11 Children

Trump and Joe Biden's last presidential debate, accusations against each other on national security

US President Trump and Republican candidate Joe Biden in the last presidential debate accused each other about national security, also accused of taking money from Russia and China. The last presidential debate took place in Nashville, Tennessee, with the Corona epidemic, national security, American families, racism, climate change and leadership skills discussed. Trump called India dirty, filthy and useless. During the debate, President Donald Trump said that the corona virus vaccine would arrive in a few days. We are learning to live with the virus, he added, adding that we are fighting the virus from China. "People are learning to die with Corona in the Trump era," Biden said. Biden also accused Trump of taking money from Russia. President Trump responded by saying that he did not take any money from Russia. Biden said there was institutional racism in the United States, while President Trump said he did not think racism was an issue in the US police force.

Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Stay Away From Libya or Face Our Bullets


Libya's eastern army general has warned Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to stay his forces out of Libya or face an armed response

According to an Arab report, the warning was issued by General Khalifa Haftar of the Libyan Eastern Army, who led the Lebanese National Army (LNA) during a dispute with the govt of National Accord (GNA) in Tripoli.

It should be noted that Recep Tayyip Erdogan has sent Turkish-backed people from Syria to fight for the GNA, who have artillery and heavy weapons, and that they have changed course.

Addressing the military on the occasion of Eid al-Adha, Haftar accused the Turkish president of "coming to Libya in search of the legacy of his ancestors."

Friday, July 17, 2020

The Story Behind the "Arab Spring" | Second and Last Part

Almost everyone interested in the situation in the Middle East will be familiar with the "Deal of the Century"

This is a so-called peace plan drawn up by the administration of US President Donald Trump, especially his son-in-law Jared Kishner, for a solution to the Palestinian problem and peace in the Middle East. 

In fact, it seeks to give Israel full access to occupied Palestine, while offering the Palestinians a small piece of land on the outskirts of their own country that they can make their home.

The plan was announced by the US president a year ago and was and still is supported by some Gulf Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain.


The Deal of the Century is a plan that is being called a one-sided and pro-Israel plan around the world, but Trump is calling it the biggest plan of the century, claiming that it would give the Palestinians a separate state. There will be no better opportunity.

With his attitude and policies, Netanyahu has made it clear that the Palestinians can never trust Israel. They have consistently limited every facility available to the Palestinians over the past decade and eliminated every possibility of peace and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. 

Now, in the presence of an extremist Donald Trump in the United States, calling the agreement that Israel has reached with his Jewish son-in-law Kishner a historic achievement.

Under the agreement, all of Netanyahu's demands have been met. Contrary to UN resolutions and the Oslo Accords, Jewish settlements in the occupied territories will be recognized and Israel will have access to more Palestinian territories. East Jerusalem will remain occupied by Israel, which will be able to recognize its "legitimate" capital from the world, while the Palestinians have been offered to make their capital in Abu Des, a small area of   West Jerusalem. This small area called Abu Des is under Israeli siege on all sides.

The plan focuses solely on the security of the Israeli people. It does not include Palestinian representation, which indicates that the Palestinians were excluded from the plan because it was intended only to benefit Israel.

Given the current state of the project and the situation in the region, it seems that the United States has forced the Gulf states to support the project by posing a threat to Iran. 

However, if the Gulf states play their part in the implementation of this plan, it is certain that this cancer called Israel will not allow any country in the Middle East to live in peace and tranquility. 

The biggest reason for this is that if there is peace in the Middle East, everyone's attention will be focused on Israeli atrocities and thus there will be threats to its security.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi attended a video conference against the regime and agreed to unite against the Zionist occupation of West Jordan and the so-called Middle East peace plan "Deal of the Century" drafted by the US President. 

If there is an agreement between Hamas and Fatah, it is a matter of concern for Israeli security, 

he told the Israeli broadcaster.

It is worth noting that if Israel considers the alliance of resistance organizations a threat to its security, how is it possible that when the Middle East countries unite against Israeli atrocities, it will ignore it?

That is, Israel will never allow peace in the Middle East, for which it has prepared the Golan Heights conflict. The Golan Heights is an area of Syria that has been occupied by Israel since 1967.

The Golan Heights cover an area of 1,200 square kilometers. They are located about 60 kilometers southwest of the Syrian capital, Damascus. There are about 30 ghettos in the area and an estimated 20,000 people have moved here. About 20,000 Syrians also live in the area. In addition to the importance of the border between Syria and Israel, it also borders Lebanon on one side and Jordan on the other.

The Golan Heights are of special importance to both Syria and Israel. The main reason is its geographical and military importance. The Syrian capital, Damascus, is clearly visible from this mountain range in southwestern Syria.

Since the Israeli occupation of the area, the Israeli army has been keeping an eye on the Syrian army and fighters from here, while the area of northern Israel is also within reach from here and from 1948 to 1967, when this mountain range was under Syrian control.
 
The Syrian army has been shelling northern Israel from here. Therefore, the geographical location of the area protects Israel against any military attack by Syria. In addition to its military importance, water for this barren region also comes from a reservoir made up of rainwater from these hills, which is Israel's third largest source of water.

Israel's occupation of the Golan Heights has sparked a never-ending conflict in the Middle East, and the United States has backed it in its illegal move.

Israel will continue to fan the flames of civil war in Syria. On the other hand, the Kurdish movement has the direct support of Israel. 

In 2017, a referendum on "independent Kurdistan" in northern Iraq was successful and more than 75% of Kurds voted in favor of a separate homeland. As soon as the results of the referendum came out, the Israeli Prime Minister immediately offered to open his embassy for "Free Christianity".

Israel's support for an independent Kurdistan is proof that it wants to keep the fire burning in the Middle East, because if the Kurdish people continue to support their struggle, the whole of the Middle East will continue to burn.

It is important to examine the geographical boundaries of Kurdistan in order to understand the fires that are being spread through Kurdistan.

Kurdistan is the name of a geographical and cultural region of the Middle East, which shares borders with four of the most important countries in the Middle East. It borders 190,000 square kilometres in Turkey, 125,000 in Iran, 65,000 in Iraq and 12,000 in Syria. Thus, the total area of Kurdistan is 392,000 square kilometres.

The Kurds are the third largest nation in the Middle East and Asia Minor after the Arabs and Turks. The majority of the 37.5 million Kurds in different countries live in Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran, while the Kurds spread all over the world, including Asia, the United States and Europe. For such a large population, the sympathy of an occupying country like Israel is noteworthy.

The purpose of the Kurdish details here is to show that the Kurds are spread over important countries in the Middle East and that the devastation that is being waged throughout the Middle East by fighting them cannot be caused by an atomic bomb.

In other words, it has been proven that Israel is like a cancer not only in the Islamic world but in the whole world which has destroyed the entire Middle East and is still engaged in it.

The Story Behind the "Arab Spring" | Part One


On December 18, 2010, Mohammed Abu Azizi, a highly educated young man in Tunisia, went on a hunger strike after failing to get a government job due to a lack of reasonable recommendation despite being on merit. Police not only stopped the young man from using the wheelbarrow without paying extortion, but also tortured him. The young man was so heartbroken by the situation that he poured petrol on himself on the road and set himself on fire.

As soon as the news spread, angry people took to the streets. 

Police in riot gear stormed a rally on Friday, removing hundreds of protesters by truck. In response, the people became more enraged, so the spark became a flame. 

Tunisia, a beautiful country on the Mediterranean coast between Algeria and Libya, caught fire from one end to the other. 

Short story Ali Zainul Abidin's dictatorial government could not stand in front of the power of the people.
 
President Ali fled and took refuge in Saudi Arabia. The protests, which began in Tunisia, gradually engulfed almost the entire Middle East.

The protests were purely the result of a public outcry against the decades-old monarchy. But behind it were many factors and forces that began to use public power to advance a very strong and well-thought-out plan to achieve their goals. 

The most important country in the plan was Syria, which is geographically located in such a place that it seems as if whoever managed to dominate the country or bring in his puppet government, as if he had conquered the whole of the Middle East. But held his strong grip.

The protests, which began in Tunisia, spread to other parts of the Arabian Peninsula and were dubbed the "Arab Spring", a revolutionary wave that began in the Arab world and spread to many Arab countries. 

Took over and overthrew decades of kingdoms

There were protests Civil war breaks out in Yemen, Libya, Iraq and Syria, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi assassinated by the people.

Protests against the rulers began in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, and Libya, and one after another succeeded; and as independence from hereditary monarchies and military dictatorships began to emerge, it was hailed internationally as a victory for democracy. 

Hundreds of Syrians staged anti-government protests in major cities on March 15, 2011, calling it a "Day of Rage." At the forefront of their demands was to bring about democratic reforms in the country.

The world powers did not take seriously the worst use of force by Bashar al-Assad in the deliberate protests in Syria. Bashar al-Assad had enough time to implement the strategy of crushing the resistance movement, and from the beginning he made every effort to end the revolution by military force.

Being a geographically the best country, the world powers tried their best to dominate here, with Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the United States and Israel topping the list. 

And so the oil-rich country's war to seize Syria's resources has killed more than half a million civilians, including 200,000 children aged 18 or under. 

Protests in Syria have called for the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who came to power in 2000 following the death of his father, Hafez al-Assad. 

The government used lethal force to crush it, which led to nationwide protests, which the government used its worst form to suppress.

This was the time that the outside forces were eagerly awaiting, and then the supporters of the opposition were given full support as well as all kinds of weapons and were prepared to defend themselves and later to fight the security forces.

This is the short story of the Arab Spring, which, put into practice under a well-prepared and well-planned plan, the world powers, with the exception of the occupying Palestinian state of Israel, plunged the entire Middle East into civil war and seized its vast resources.

It is important to note that none of the countries in the Middle East that have revolted against the governments have uttered a word against the West or the United States. 

Otherwise, it is common sense that whenever Muslims are persecuted, they are first acquitted by blaming Jews and Christians, first of all, on the payroll of governments. They do not shy away from using the less educated people in the name of religion to protect their own interests.

But in all these circumstances, no anti-American protests were seen or heard from any place. It is truly astonishing how this sudden wave of revolution started when the monarchy and dictatorship in these countries had been going on for years, if not decades.

Some experts are of the opinion that what happened at this juncture in their path or stage was not only a deliberate move but also a natural consequence of a long period of oppression and tyranny.

But here my opinion is different and the reason is the change that took place after a long protest in Tahrir Square in Egypt and then the Egyptian nation that remained silent after the overthrow of the democratic government of military general Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Who started a revolution in Egypt after a long protest and then remained silent about the seizure of power by a military dictator as a result of this revolution. This raises many questions.

The statements of the US governments regarding the revolutions in the Middle East seemed to indicate that the US was not at all aware of the extraordinary changes taking place in the Arab countries, while the general impression of the Arabs was that of the Arab countries. 

The United States knows more than the Arab authorities themselves, and its embassies know every little thing about these countries. But the American reaction to the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt showed that the United States did not even notice the sound of the Arab revolutions, nor did its masterminds devise a strategy to deal with such situations. 

This does not make sense, while Israel sits in the heart of Arabia and US policies are formulated in Tel Aviv instead of Washington.

In the Arab uprising, the United States first sought the help of its allies in Tunisia and Egypt and with Gaddafi in Libya to protect its interests, then as the protests escalated, so did Washington's tone against these ancient allies. However, the situation was settled in due course. 

The United States, like any other country, has the right to pursue its own interests, but in the current context, this hesitation was a testament to the moral decay of the former US President Obama's administration I spoke of strengthening the values of democracy and freedom and helping to bring about peaceful change.

But when the time really came to test, the same administration sided with the dictatorial regimes that it had bolstered by claiming to protect stability and prevent Islamists from taking over the government.

It is important to understand why and how much the United States is interested in the Middle East.

As I have said before, the influence of powerful Jews in the United States on American policies is extraordinary, as expressed by key American national security officials.

In March 2010, the then head of US Central Command, General David Petraeus, briefed the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying that one of the major "security challenges" facing the United States was Israel, which posed a threat to US security.

A similar acknowledgment was made by former US President Jimmy Carter that the Israeli "pressure group" that put pressure on Washington has become one of the most influential parties in the United States, influencing US national security policies.

There are about 6 million Jews in the United States.

Jews in the United States are active under different names. Jews have established their roots in all American institutions under names such as the Lobby, the Pressure Group, the Interest Group, and the Third House. The impact of this strong influence is evident in US domestic and foreign policies, which are based on the phrase "Israel first."

Most Jews in the United States are very rich. The wealthy Jewish people have also played a key role in bringing American decisions in Israel's favor.

Billions of dollars worth of these Jews have used their money to buy members of Congress and the US House of Representatives forever, putting significant pressure on US decisions that are in Israel's favor.

You may be surprised to learn that although Jews make up only 2% of the American population, the proportion of Jews in the US Congress is 7%, while 36 out of 535 legislators in the US House of Representatives and Senate are Jews. 9% of the Senate body. Democrats in the US Senate are Jewish. These figures make it easy to gauge the role of Jews in American politics.

We are all well aware of the role of media. The media is one of the most deadly and dangerous weapons of our time. It manipulates the minds of the people in this way and shows only the side of the picture that is in its interest. And the Jews are fully aware of that.

So all the big and small media owners in America and Europe are Jewish. Broadcasters such as ABC News, CNN, Fox News, BBC, CBC News and NBC are Jewish-owned.

Newspapers, magazines and journals are owned by the Jewish family Arthur Salisburg, and the Washington Post is owned by Catherine Graham Meyer. The Wall Street Journal is the largest-selling newspaper in the United States, owned by a Jewish family called Peter Kane.

In addition to American and British news channels, the owners of news channels in French, German and many other European countries are also Jewish.

The world's two most important news agencies, Reuters and Agency France-Press (AFP), are also Jewish. Reuters founder Julius Paul was a German Jew, AFP's old name was "House" which was named after its Jewish founder.

In addition to newspapers, TV channels, and news agencies, Jews in the United States also own large publishing houses. For example, the owners of large and well-known publishing houses such as Time Warner Media Group, Simon & Schuster and Random House are Jewish.

Therefore, the decisions that are made in American institutions and what is published in the media and other media in the United States are completely in favor of Israel.

The United States and the Americans cannot oppose Israel and the Zionists in any way because they are being run by Israel and the Zionists.

This is information that will help you better understand the Middle East civil war and the US interest in it, that the US is not as interested in the Middle East as it should be. And behind it are all the motives that are in the hands of the Jews.

It is worth noting here that if one pays the slightest attention, it will not be long before one realizes that the whole of the Middle East is burning in an unseen fire.

The civil war in Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and the Middle East has so far killed more than 1.6 million people, of whom more than 550,000 belonged to Syria alone.

But the Mediterranean state of Israel is an example of peace. How is this possible? Behind all these conspiracies is Israel, which is using the United States to achieve its nefarious goals.

To be continued.....

Saturday, May 18, 2013

USA l "Russia will encourage the Syrian regime by selling new missiles"


United States Friday criticized Russia for sending missiles to the Syrian Governmentafter plans to organize a peace conference sponsored by Washington and Moscow are adversely affected by diplomatic friction around the goal and scope of the event. The highest military officer rank of the United StatesGen. Martin Dempsey , described the recent delivery of Russian missiles to the Government of Al Assad as "untimely and very unfortunate" and said it risked prolonging a war that has left at least 80,000 dead and 1.5 million displaced, according to UN. While not directly respond to claims that U.S. had sent missiles Yakhont , a spokesman for President Vladimir Putin said that Russia  would honor the weapons supply contracts with Syria , which has been a client of the arsenal of Moscow since the Cold War . "It's at least an unfortunate decision that will encourage the regime and prolong the suffering", said Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters. With a range of 300 kilometers, the missile Yakhont could be a threat to warships in the Mediterranean if, for example, the Western powers put aside their deep reluctance and intervene to provide air support to the Syrian rebels, as did in Libya  two years ago. So far no date has been agreed for the international peace meeting face increasing obstacles appear. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, met with Putin in Russia on Friday said that the conference should take place as soon possible. But a fact that highlights the diplomatic challenge it represents, France said on Friday that he would oppose any meeting if Iran's regional ally Assad , receives an invitation, contrary to Russia's position that Tehran should be part of any peaceful solution. Rebel leaders will meet with its Western allies and Arab in Amman on Wednesday to discuss how to address the conference. 

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Chavez and his controversial alliances

The rejection of the "imperialist hegemony" and the desire to promote a world "multipolar" led by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez , to establish during his 14-year rule controversial alliances with leaders of Iran, Syria, Libya and Belarus, some under sanctions international. Loyal to their declarations of friendship, was virtually the only world leader to support the deceased former dictator extreme LibyanMuammar Gaddafi , a "martyr", said overthrown in October 2011 after more than 40 years at the helm of the country, and remained a fierce supporter of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad , which he considered a "victim of a fascist onslaught". Just on a visit to his "brother" Al Asad to Caracas in June 2010, Chavez joked that both were part of the so-called "Axis of Evil" , the group of countries with whom the U.S. president George W. Bushput in his sights and which included Iraq, Iran and North Korea. But then he added that Chavez stands for that group corresponded to the "Movement of Free Allies" (MAL) , which included all those who contribute to the creation of a "multipolar" world and cited as common enemies "the Yankee empire and the genocidal state of Israel." Since Chavez came to power in 1999, the foreign relations of Venezuela, the country with the largest proven oil reserves in the world, have continued to raise dust. Chavez received several times the country visit by Iranian PresidentMahmoud Ahmadinejad , even amid tensions in the Persian Gulf and a growing pressure from Western countries for alleged military nuclear program in Tehran . "We do not want that task we had touched. But we have had, stop, stop, stop the imperialist madness that has now been unleashed like never before in a long time ever, "Chavez said then. With the arrival of Ahmadinejad to the Government in 2005, the relationship between Venezuela and Iran has narrowed both ideologically and in the economic sector, with around 5,000 million dollars exchange trading, and agreements for cooperation in sectors such as energy. This alliance has not been welcomed by countries like the United States , through the Department of State, passed in May 2011 to seven international companies, including state Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) , to support Iran's energy sector. The sanctions, administrative, not translated into concrete and, in fact, Venezuela is not stopped sending 1.2 million barrels per day to the United States, its top trading partner, despite massive protests staged by the ruling. Along with Iran, relations are Syria , Libya or Belarus focus the international spotlight, it also monitors the close military relationship with Russia or some compromise to the North Korean regime. The relationship between Chavez and Gaddafi went back to 2004. Companions of battles in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Venezuela still remember the "tent" that the Libyan leader then installed in the tourist island of Margarita in September 2009 for the Second Summit Africa-South America (ASA ). Also controversial was his relationship with the head of Belarusian State, Alexander Lukashenko , whom some consider the last dictator in Europe and Venezuela whose country has a trade of2,000 million dollars with construction agreements, oil and gas distribution. Ties with Syria dating from 2006 and have been translated into thirty agreements, mainly in food and energy, such as that included the construction of a refinery in Homs. The case is the most ambiguous DPRK within Venezuelan diplomatic relations. On 19 December last year, Chavez expressed his "sincere regret" over the death of North Korean leader, "Comrade" Kim Jong-il . Venezuela and North Korea trade relations have expanded since Chávez came to power who has come out against the U.S. criticism Korean regime.So, in late 2010, Chávez blamed a military crisis between North Korea and South Korea to a "premeditated action of factors of the far right" of the United States. Relations with Cuba deserve a separate chapter. Chavez linked to the Cuban revolution with its political process and considered Fidel Castro a "father" who constantly praised and which has sought inspiration for his government.

Friday, February 22, 2013

ASIA | Argumentation Pyongyang regime North Korea justifies its nuclear program to avoid that happening and Libya


North Korea has said it will continue to strengthen its nuclear deterrent toprevent "tragic consequences" of countries that abandoned their nuclear ambitions by external pressure, in an apparent reference to Libya. "The tragic consequences in countries in recent years stopped halfway nuclear programs, yielding to the despotic practices and U.S. pressure, clearly demonstrate that North Korea was very proactive and fair "to make its recent nuclear test , indicated the North's KCNA state agency. The main speaker editorial regime Kim Jong-un indirectly alludes, South Korean experts said, the case of Libya, where the regime of Muammar Gaddafi fell because of domestic opposition with the support of foreign forces in 2011, eight years after leaving their nuclear weapons programs and massive destruction. The KCNA also alleges that the "relentless nuclear blackmail and sanctions" of Washington, which he accused of threatening the country with preventive atomic attacks , try to violate the right of North Korea to self-determination. With this, justified that the North Korean regime militarized "opts for a strategic decision to respond to nuclear weapons with nuclear weapons."In any case, North Korea and once again reaffirmed their intention to continue to develop its nuclear program, which considers itself a defensive measure to ensure deterrence against it considers "hostile policy"of U.S. ally supported by Korea South. The new North Korean action, widely condemned internationally , has opened the debate about further tightening of sanctions on the communist country on the UN already has several trade restrictions and armaments for its past "provocations".

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The race to the White House l Ten lessons from the last debate


Barack Obama and Mitt Romney clashed on Monday in the final against each other in the race for the White House. The discussion dealt with foreign policy. Although candidates managed to speak of economics, which is the most important issue for most Americans and they will decide the outcome of the polls . These are the lessons of the last TV duel. Are exactly two weeks to election day.

1. Obama was stronger

The President confirmed the predictions and won the debate on points. Foreign policy tends to favor the incumbent, who has four years to address global challenges in the White House. Obama knows much more than his opponent about what happens in the world and it showed on Tuesday with a solid and well-constructed speech .

2. Romney played no scare

The Republican candidate chose not to use both weapons had now within reach: the bombing that killed four Americans in Benghazi and the controversy surrounding the possible negotiations in Iran .Romney chose to be cautious for fear of transmitting the idea that a president would be trigger happy. He played for a draw and so lost.But he left without making serious mistakes and left the impression that it is ready to be commander in chief. A test that he had to pass.

3. Romney in hostile territory

Foreign policy always favors the president. But even on this occasion by the skills of the Republican candidate, who has based his campaign on economic issues and has ignored what is happening on the international scene. Other governors like Bill Clinton in 1992 and George W. Bush in 2000 chose a second with experience in global affairs. Romney chose young congressman Paul Ryan, which reinforces its commitment to domestic issues. In the third debate offered firmly but without burning warrior. She felt stiff when reciting the phrases of his advisers. improved when the debate the economy slid . But then it was too late.

4. The most boring match

Only 4% of Americans believe that foreign policy is the most important issue in this election. This figure helps to understand why the debate was so boring and why Romney was less aggressive than in the first two appointments. The Republican candidate thought better than to throw open grave against the president in a matter that only concerns citizens. Its strategic calculation was that it suited him more present as a moderate and conciliatory president . Let's wait to see if it was a successful bid.

5. The Stone Guest

George W. Bush was the star of the foreign policy debate. Obama endorsed some of their assumptions and is presented as a "hawk" on issues like Iran or the use of drones in the fight against terrorism. Romney, however, made ​​every effort to distance himself from the poisoned legacy of former president and tried to convince the electorate that did not want to start an intervention like Iran or Afghanistan.

6. Less Iran and more unemployment

Both candidates strove to divert the discussion to the economy the most important issue for polls show half of Americans. In this area Romney was again better than his opponent and underlined the key points of your message. But both failed to sign any obviousObama unscathed and Boca Raton.

7. The advantages of the president

Obama appeared in his first sentence as "commander in chief" and then mentioned the death of Osama bin Laden . His goal was to refute those who portray him as a second Jimmy Carter and presented as a weak president who has led the U.S. to abdicate its global leadership. Romney was less aggressive than at other times.He accused the president of "making a tour to apologize" for the mistakes of the U.S.. But he did not target or on issues like Iran Benghazi and said that he agreed with him in the management of the Syrian crisis and withdrawal from Afghanistan. There was less discussion than usual because it suited neither disagree

8. Drawn

The race is very close and it does not seem that the victory of Obama in the last debate you move. The average web produced by the RCP puts the Republican candidate a few tenths ahead of his opponent . This figure reflects the polarization of the campaign and that indicates that Obama and Romney must sprint to the end.

9. The Midwest

Romney is ahead in some national polls. But polls place him behind in the battleground states of the Midwest. Places like Iowa, Ohio and Wisconsin are the last defense of the president, which resists better there than in states like Florida , Virginia and New Hampshire .The Republican candidate will only come to the White House if improvement in the Midwest. A region in which Obama is reaping the electoral gains of the bailout of the automobile industry and where by now retains a small advantage but enough to win.

10. Romney depends abstention

There are still two weeks to the elections. Many citizens have voted and the majority have decided who to vote for. The polls predict a closely fought battle in the final days of the campaign, warning that the winner is determined by the extent of participation. Will the president take to the polls who supported him four years ago and now hesitating between staying home or voting for him? Obama came to the White House with the votes of women, young people, Hispanics and blacks. Sectors of the population who do not usually go to the polls and among them the illusion has evaporated 2008.now in your hands the victory of Obama. Romney will win if they will not vote.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Final campaign debate: Obama: "Iran does not have nuclear weapons as long as President"


President Barack Obama strongly challenged Mitt Romney on foreign policy in the third and final campaign debate Monday night, saying that " every time you offered an opinion has been wrong . " The Republican said coldly: " attack is not an agenda . " With the two men seated at a semicircular table, the first moments of the debate did not produce any of the allegations and few disruptions that marked the debate last week . But there were no matches on Libya ,  Syria , Russia  and other national security issues at the meeting at Lynn University. 

On Iran, Obama was blunt: " As long as U.S. president Iran will not get a nuclear weapon . It would be a threat to our security and that of Israel. The work we did in terms of sanctions has worked . Iran gives the option of taking the diplomatic and face a world united. wanted all participating countries, to Russia and China, because if we do together will be more important . " It would be a mistake to attack Iran , "he continued, but added:" I will be with Israel if attacked . " And, after denying that there is a one to one dialogue with Tehran, concluded: "The Iranians must convince the international community that stopped their program and submit to inspections. 're not going to stop putting pressure ". Romney pledged to help Israel if president, saying "there is no doubt the ability of Iran to have nuclear weapons." "It is a threat to our friends and us. dissuade We need to not have weapons . You have to accuse Ahmadinejad of terrorist, I will ensure that Iran does not go to any international convention. The military option is the last resort. " "The president said that things are going so well. But I see Iran near a pump. For thejihadists increasing in number and Syria with 30 people dead, "he added.

Obama responded by recalling some contradictions of its rival. "You refer to topics like talking to the Israelis but never before said he would, in the same way that says it should have ended the war in Iraq and it was crazy to go after Khadaffi. said we should not move heaven and earth to go after Bin Laden"listed. Facing criticism of Romney Stadium for showing weak States to Iran, the president rebuked him: "When we speak of these sanctions, the toughest of the story, where was you? was investing in a Chinese company doing business with Iran " Romney said that despite early hopes, the fall of regimes in Egypt , Libya and elsewhere over the past year has generated "a rising tide of chaos." He said the president has failed to integrate a coherent policy to deal with the change that has swept the Middle East, adding ominously that a group like Al-Qaeda has taken over the north of Mali. Anticipating one of the most frequent statements of the Obama campaign, Romney said of the man sitting next to him: " I am pleased to have eliminated Osama bin Laden and attack the leadership of Al-Qaeda. But we can, through killings, out of this mess .... We must have a comprehensive strategy. "



Obama replied that he had ended the war in Iraq , it was on track to end U.S. combat operations in Afghanistan and had promised to bring to justice those who attacked the U.S. embassy in Benghazi last month, an attack that the ambassador left the country died in Libya and three other Americans. Although it was expected that both reprise their crosses for the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi , where the theme was suggested by the moderator Obama and Romney were diverted to discuss the Arab Spring .
 

"We need to see a total change in the Middle East , more hopeful, to allow more participation. But we have seen a number of very disturbing events, "said McCain. "We have to make the Muslim world reject the extremists alone , do not want another Iran, "he added. Obama for his part defended the work his administration is facing the events in Syria."What we have done is to organize the international community by agreeing that Bashar al Assad must go , "he said but added that" the Syrians will end what should make the decision. "What we see is that the opposition to help-this is a very risky step, we must first be completely sure that we are helping our friends and we are not giving weapons to our enemies," he said. Coincidentally, Romney said he wanted a military intervention there. "The right course is to identify the organized opposition in Syria and help in the form of advice. Those who are responsible should be armed . We have to be friends with that tomorrow will govern responsibly, "he said. Romney hit Obama for saying during the campaign that Russia is the enemy number one geopolitical United States . "Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy seems to want you policies the 1980s, as you want to import the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s , "he said.

The confrontation at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida, which lasted 90 minutes, the candidates offered their last chance to measure themselves against each other tens of millions of Americans. Both devoted their weekends to prepare , a sure sign of the importance given to this event. The meeting, which focused on foreign policy, came when two weeks before the day of the election and at a time when the polls show a very close campaignApart from the final debate, both candidates intend to embark on a whirlwind campaign for the last two weeks. The president is scheduled to speak in six states over a two-day trip that starts Wednesday and includes a night aboard Air Force One while flying from Las Vegas to Tampa. Romney seeks to visit two or three states per day.