Trump Revealed || He Wanted To Assassinate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad

US President Donald Trump has uncovered that he needed to kill Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2017, yet then-Defense Secretary James Mattis kept him from doing as such. 

In a program on the US telecaster Fox News, President Trump uncovered that he needed to eliminate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from the way for which the arrangement was prepared, yet the less gallant Secretary of Defense James Mattis held up traffic and we were unable to actualize it. 

That is actually what Washington Post writer Bob Woodward uncovered in his book, Fair: Trump in the White House, in 2018, and afterward President Trump rejected that he (Bashar) Assassination of Assad was rarely thought of. 

The Story Behind the "Arab Spring" | Second and Last Part

Almost everyone interested in the situation in the Middle East will be familiar with the "Deal of the Century". 

This is a so-called peace plan drawn up by the administration of US President Donald Trump, especially his son-in-law Jared Kishner, for a solution to the Palestinian problem and peace in the Middle East. 

In fact, it seeks to give Israel full access to occupied Palestine, while offering the Palestinians a small piece of land on the outskirts of their own country that they can make their home.

The plan was announced by the US president a year ago and was and still is supported by some Gulf Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain.

Read the first part of the blog here: The Story behind the "Arab Spring"

The Deal of the Century is a plan that is being called a one-sided and pro-Israel plan around the world, but Trump is calling it the biggest plan of the century, claiming that it would give the Palestinians a separate state. There will be no better opportunity.

With his attitude and policies, Netanyahu has made it clear that the Palestinians can never trust Israel. They have consistently limited every facility available to the Palestinians over the past decade and eliminated every possibility of peace and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. 

Now, in the presence of an extremist Donald Trump in the United States, calling the agreement that Israel has reached with his Jewish son-in-law Kishner a historic achievement.

Under the agreement, all of Netanyahu's demands have been met. Contrary to UN resolutions and the Oslo Accords, Jewish settlements in the occupied territories will be recognized and Israel will have access to more Palestinian territories. East Jerusalem will remain occupied by Israel, which will be able to recognize its "legitimate" capital from the world, while the Palestinians have been offered to make their capital in Abu Des, a small area of   West Jerusalem. This small area called Abu Des is under Israeli siege on all sides.

The plan focuses solely on the security of the Israeli people. It does not include Palestinian representation, which indicates that the Palestinians were excluded from the plan because it was intended only to benefit Israel.

Given the current state of the project and the situation in the region, it seems that the United States has forced the Gulf states to support the project by posing a threat to Iran. 

However, if the Gulf states play their part in the implementation of this plan, it is certain that this cancer called Israel will not allow any country in the Middle East to live in peace and tranquility. 

The biggest reason for this is that if there is peace in the Middle East, everyone's attention will be focused on Israeli atrocities and thus there will be threats to its security.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi attended a video conference against the regime and agreed to unite against the Zionist occupation of West Jordan and the so-called Middle East peace plan "Deal of the Century" drafted by the US President. 

If there is an agreement between Hamas and Fatah, it is a matter of concern for Israeli security, 

he told the Israeli broadcaster.

It is worth noting that if Israel considers the alliance of resistance organizations a threat to its security, how is it possible that when the Middle East countries unite against Israeli atrocities, it will ignore it?

That is, Israel will never allow peace in the Middle East, for which it has prepared the Golan Heights conflict. The Golan Heights is an area of Syria that has been occupied by Israel since 1967.

The Golan Heights cover an area of 1,200 square kilometers. They are located about 60 kilometers southwest of the Syrian capital, Damascus. There are about 30 ghettos in the area and an estimated 20,000 people have moved here. About 20,000 Syrians also live in the area. In addition to the importance of the border between Syria and Israel, it also borders Lebanon on one side and Jordan on the other.

The Golan Heights are of special importance to both Syria and Israel. The main reason is its geographical and military importance. The Syrian capital, Damascus, is clearly visible from this mountain range in southwestern Syria.

Since the Israeli occupation of the area, the Israeli army has been keeping an eye on the Syrian army and fighters from here, while the area of northern Israel is also within reach from here and from 1948 to 1967, when this mountain range was under Syrian control.

 

The Syrian army has been shelling northern Israel from here. Therefore, the geographical location of the area protects Israel against any military attack by Syria. In addition to its military importance, water for this barren region also comes from a reservoir made up of rainwater from these hills, which is Israel's third largest source of water.

Israel's occupation of the Golan Heights has sparked a never-ending conflict in the Middle East, and the United States has backed it in its illegal move.

Israel will continue to fan the flames of civil war in Syria. On the other hand, the Kurdish movement has the direct support of Israel. 

In 2017, a referendum on "independent Kurdistan" in northern Iraq was successful and more than 75% of Kurds voted in favor of a separate homeland. As soon as the results of the referendum came out, the Israeli Prime Minister immediately offered to open his embassy for "Free Christianity".

Israel's support for an independent Kurdistan is proof that it wants to keep the fire burning in the Middle East, because if the Kurdish people continue to support their struggle, the whole of the Middle East will continue to burn.

It is important to examine the geographical boundaries of Kurdistan in order to understand the fires that are being spread through Kurdistan.

Kurdistan is the name of a geographical and cultural region of the Middle East, which shares borders with four of the most important countries in the Middle East. It borders 190,000 square kilometres in Turkey, 125,000 in Iran, 65,000 in Iraq and 12,000 in Syria. Thus, the total area of Kurdistan is 392,000 square kilometres.

The Kurds are the third largest nation in the Middle East and Asia Minor after the Arabs and Turks. The majority of the 37.5 million Kurds in different countries live in Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran, while the Kurds spread all over the world, including Asia, the United States and Europe. For such a large population, the sympathy of an occupying country like Israel is noteworthy.

The purpose of the Kurdish details here is to show that the Kurds are spread over important countries in the Middle East and that the devastation that is being waged throughout the Middle East by fighting them cannot be caused by an atomic bomb.

In other words, it has been proven that Israel is like a cancer not only in the Islamic world but in the whole world which has destroyed the entire Middle East and is still engaged in it.

Assad's candidacy is bad for everyone, including himself

Bygone days when Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad announced his candidacy for a third presidential term, I remembered a passage from the play Waiting for Godot, Samuel Beckett. This classic theater of the absurd, whose plot is intentionally any relevant fact, is highly repetitive and symbolizes the tedium and meaninglessness of human life. In one passage, Tarragon, one of the two tramps waiting in vain for Godot says: "Can not be worse ' The review is completed by Vladimir response, another tramp, who responds: "That's what you think." The impression that there is a touch of the absurd in the Syrian situation was reinforced a few days ago when the official media in Tehran reported that the Islamic Republic plans to send "providers" to ensure "freedom and regularity of the election of Syria "next June. De Min, Kafkaesque sounds that Iranian mullahs are the guarantors of free elections in Syria. It is like putting the cat in the care of the canary. Syria's civil war is a tragic play that already has become everything that could become before the curtain rises. The Syrian conflict began more than three years ago because a segment of the population was simply tired of decades of arrogant and despotic power of the Assad clan and their corrupt partners. With the passage of a few months, the initial complaints of the protesters from the city of Deraa found a surprisingly deep resonance in most cities and towns in the country. To be fair, Bashar was certainly not responsible for all that had gone wrong in Syria since the country came under the rule of successive administrations Baath Party headed by his father, the late Al-Assad Haffez.Indeed, it is even may Bashar, an indecisive weakling, may well have been a mere puppet of a gang that operates in the shadows of the party. Within a few weeks of the uprising in Deraa, however called off Bashar became the unifying theme of a popular uprising that brought together a wide variety of many different groups with different political ideologies and aspirations. In 2013, demand that Bashar must go became the only point at which almost everyone, including many within the Assad regime, seemed to agree. At one point, a diplomatic initiative involving senior officials in Damascus and the administration of President Barack Obama in Washington abroqueló around the idea that Bashar had to step aside to allow the formation of a coalition government and transition. The euphemism "step aside" was chosen instead of "resign" to reassure the Russians who opposed regime change in Syria. The phrase "Bashar must go" became the focus of all diplomatic efforts, starting with the desperate mission to Kofi Annan and Lakhdar Brahimi, but ultimately none of that happened. The first Geneva agreement approved by Washington and Moscow was based on the output of Bashar. That would have paved the way to a more or less peaceful transition. It would have allowed the Syrian government structures remained largely intact, avoiding systemic collapse. The Baath Party and its allies had been able to maintain a share of power in a new national agreement, with the support of the majority of Syrians, and guaranteed by the great powers through the United Nations. At the same time, recognizing the commitment as an effective means of conflict resolution, it would have pulled the rug on both sides whose vision of politics was based on repression and violence. Perhaps more importantly, the commitment would have saved the ordeal Syrian caused by broken families, clans and communities, while the domestication of sectarian hatred that was hiding under the carpet for centuries could have been controlled. Yet nothing that happened.Perhaps encouraged by hard line segments from Tehran, Damascus clique decided not only reject power sharing in a future coalition government, but also to humiliate the opposition Bashar keeping in office. As I write these lines, the Iranian official media provide that Bashar will be reelected with "even bigger majority" that won last time when he won by 97% of the vote. This could mean a victory by 100% in June, and repeating the feat remembered Saddam Hussein in his time as head of Iraq. The Syrian uprising started because in 2011 when the status quo is unsustainable around. Three years of conflict have created a new situation even more unstable. In both cases, the status quo was, rightly or wrongly, symbolized by Assad. Therefore, if your departure was necessary to change in 2011, is an even greater need today. The decision to run for a new presidential term Bashar, buries the option of a change within the regime. The issue now is the change of regime. This can happen in two ways. Either because the Assad clique is successful in crushing the opposition, which in my view can not fully achieve for many years; or opposition grouped and re-armed begins a new round on his way to the conquest of Damascus, which, despite the odds, I do not think we currently possible. The third option would be the transformation of Syria into a mosaic of ungoverned territories, part of which would be controlled by the Assad clique. Assad's candidacy is bad news not only for Syria but for the Baas own, also to Iran and Russia will have to continue to fund an extended outlook victory without conflict . Thus, Tehran and Moscow will be paying for a lover who becomes more demanding and more expensive every day. Finally, Bashar's candidacy may even be detrimental to the Assad himself. An agreement to take a "step back" would be a good deal for him and his last option would set even maneuver to safeguard their safety and that of your family.

The Syrian regime has the largest chemical arsenal in the Middle East

It aims to make conventional forces armed mostly countries, as "historic enemy" Israel. The reports detail the availability of between 500 and 1,000 metric tons of "chemical agents", whose production was carried out in a decentralized manner by companies from various countries. In case of "best efforts", the chemical weapons production effort can reach "few hundred tons per year." There are four production sites which Syria can count: one in the north of Damascus, another near Homs, one in Hama and another near Cerin. The scenario comes from a recent analysis of Rid, Italian Defence Journal, warning that define exactly the type and quality of Syrian chemical arsenal is not simple because the true and verifiable news scarce. The country is impervious to international control he says. The quality and quantity of Syrian chemical endowment follows, therefore, of the attitude of Damascus accessiona relation to international protocols. Although part since 1968 Geneva Protocol, which prohibits the use as a source of chemical weapons, Syria never signed the Chemichal Weapons Convention (CWC). Also implicitly admitted Damascus some chemical arsenal available to refusing for years to consider any proposed inspection or disarmament by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), ie, the international body that deals the implementation of the CWC. Made its considering that Israel admitted possession of its own nuclear weapons. Moreover, the threat by the regime of Assad to employ chemical munitions against any outside intervention forces, which he said would not happen on their own people, is considered a further admission that it has such weapons. The leap in quality in the Syrian chemical arsenal, said Rid, occurred between the 80s and early 90s , and then had another resizing. In this latest cooperation was crucial between Damascus and Iran in the mid-2000s, which "enabled the implementation of more efficient facilities" for the development of chemical agents. These four manufacturing units are spread over large areas small structures, to reduce vulnerability in the event of air strikes. Storage sites, however, are in Homs, Latakia, Palmyra, Hama and al-Safira, near Aleppo. In its analysis, the Italian Journal of Defense tends to conclude that they are between 50 and 100 heads of ballistic missiles with chemical load that has the Damascus regime. According to official statements of the Free Syrian Amy, chemical weapons were used by Syria in at least 18 opportunities in fighting on Damascus, Idlib, Homs and Hama, with no international organization could confirm these episodes.

Cornered by the criticism, al-Assad relieved the leadership of his party

The ruling party of Syria Baath announced Monday the renewal of the dome , with thesubstitution of a dozen officials loyal to the regime of Bashar Al Assad, according to official news agency SANA. The appointment of a new command of the Baath obeys the conflict that exists in the country , where Assad crackdown against civilians corners him against the growing opposition and international pressure. With the renovation of the dome, elected at a meeting of the party's central committee, the president hopes to give new impetus to his government . According to one member, Fayez Sayegh, the reorganization is intended to inject fresh blood into the party. Despite these changes, Al Assad will remain the party's general secretary , who is ruling from the military regime in 1963, before the current president's father, Hafez Al Assad, the executive branch was made ​​a coup in 1970. However, the vice-president, Farouk al-Shara , Sunni origin while Al Assad's Alawite-,was removed from office . According to the opposition, this is because it is critical of repression, so it would be under house arrest for contradicting the regime . In fact, since the beginning of the rebellion in March 2011, barely seen in public. On the other hand, an Arab diplomat in Beirut said that before the replacement of party leadership, some members have protested the excessive violence against people in the rebel areas , according to news agency DPA. In opposition to the regime there were also changes Monday. The prime minister of the opposition, Ghassan Hitto, resigned, citing his inability to form an interim government. The symbolic announcements were made ​​at a time when violence in the city of Homs has intensified . 10 days ago, government forces began a push to recover the districts held by the opposition.

Assad l "The captain does not run in the middle of the storm"

"The accusations against Syria in the use of weapons  chemical  change every day. And this is likely to be used as a prelude to a war against our country , "said Bashar Al Assad  in dialogue with Argentine journalists. "They said they use chemical weapons against residential areas. Now, if they were used on a city or suburb with a balance of ten or twenty victims would it be credible? Its use would mean the deaths of thousands or tens of thousands of people in minutes. Who could hide such a thing? "he added. The whole conversation revolved around the same thing: the cause of the problem is outside and make self-criticism was never considered . Much less the possibility of resigning to decompress the conflict within the framework of peace negotiations. "For someone to say that the Syrian president must leave because the United States, other countries or terrorists what they want is something unacceptable. This issue is solved through a popular choice of the polls in the elections scheduled for 2014, "he said. "The country is in crisis, and when the boat is in the midst of the storm, the captain does not flee. And give would flee, "he added. So great is the international conspiracy to Al Assad, who is convinced that no Western country wants to improve the situation in their country. "There are terrorists in 29 countries fighting in Syria, so do not think that many Western nations that support them actually want a solution," he said. " West lies and falsified evidence to wage wars , that is their custom. now Israel instructed the attack days ago  to boost the morale of terrorist groups, "he continued. However, he gave arguments against his claim, to note that some of the main insurgent groups are radical Islamists, strongly anti-Western. "A Western governments mind having loyal as those that existed in Latin America, who exploited the people to deliver their goods. And if they are extremists, wear now and fight later. Though the disputed Afghanistan : Taliban supported and 11-S paid a very high price, "he said.Nevertheless, he insisted that Dialogue has a position and would accept to attend the international conference that the U.S. and Russia intend to do in Geneva  to find a solution to the conflict, but with the requirement that opponents abandon armed struggle. "We have received good Russian-American rapprochement, but we must be realistic. We always opted for dialogue with any party that wants to do, but this does not include terrorists. A State talks with terrorists, "he said. And to leave no doubt of his real thought, ended relativizing the utility of a negotiation."There is confusion in the world believe that a political conference stop terrorism on the ground and that's unreal , "he said.

Over 80,000 killed in two years of Syrian revolt

More than 80,000 people nearly half of them civilians, have been killed in Syria since the start of the uprising against the regime of Bashar Assad, as announced on Sunday the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. The uprising, which began in March 2011 with peaceful pro-democracy protests bloodily repressed by the regime, has been transformed into a deadly civil war that, according to the UN, also left 4.2 million displaced and 1.4 million refugees. The balance includes 70,257 deaths among civilians, soldiers and rebels and more than 12,000 reporters and pro-Assad militiamen, according to figures compiled by military and medical sources. The names OSDH 34,473 civilians, including 4,788 children and 3,049 women, 16,687 and 16,729 rebel soldiers and deserters. In addition there are 2,368 dead and 12,000 unidentified informants and pro Damascus militiamen killed. According to the OSDH, the figures do not cover the 10,000 detained by the regime and 2,500 members of the pro-Assad forces of the rebel prisoners.

Syria l Assad, we can not give

In Syria and 'being a'' war'' and the regime has no choice but to come out victorious,' cause otherwise it would be the'' end'' of the country. This was stated by President Bashar al-Assad in an interview with the official TV station Al Ikhbariya:'' I repeat, no surrender and no submission.'' Assad also accused the West of supporting the terrorists of al Qaeda in Syria warning that will pay'' ''' dear this policy as' already' in the past.

Opposition rejects the "peace plan" of Assad

After Bashar al-Assad on Sunday rejected holding peace talks with its opponents, in hisfirst public speech in six months, the opposition rejected what was presented by the regime as a new peace plan. George Sabra , vice chairman of the opposition National Coalition, told Reuters that the plan that the dictator said in his speech "does not even deserve to be called an initiative." "Instead we should see it as a statement that will continue its war against the people of Syria, "he said. "The appropriate response is to continue resisting this regime unacceptable and that the Free Syrian Army continue its work until every inch of Syria is free," he said. The speech was widely seen as a response to UN mediator, Lakhdar Brahimi , who has been meeting with Russian and U.S. officials to try to overcome the differences between Washington and Moscow on a peace plan for Syria . Opponents of Assad foreigners were derogatory to the recent speech by Syrian dictator. "His comments are just repetitions of what has always said , "the Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu. "Seems like I'm locked in a room and only read the intelligence reports that are delivered," he said. The UN estimates that some 60,000 people died in the civil war in Syria, the most protracted and bloody conflict emerged in two years of unrest in the Arab world.