Modi's second spectacular success where the storm hit India in India shocked the world. Unless the extent of thinking about Modi's Hindutwa ideology and self-reliance by Modi's RSS, this election victory can not prove to be good for India and its neighbors.
Vajpayee got to see the tilt but Modi himself is keeping it limited. It is possible that they now see themselves as a manifestation of the true form of Hindutva ideology and its legitimacy. It can be said that taking advantage of this thing Modi can change if Hindutva ideology, ideas and vision convert into a more collective and reasonable politics. However, at present time, there are no signs of change in this era.
So you will not hesitate to say that the RSS has won but India has lost. Hindustva, as a fascist, sectarian, unreasonable and revenge ideology, can never provide a foundation to India, standing on the stand, and this country could stand itself as a powerful force in the 21st Century. As an extremist movement, it was found in all political societies. But this ideology will get the mainstream position turning India's future towards ease and will become a threat to the region but potentially global stability.
The Chinese Revolution was inspired by the power of 'emotional century' that could not be tolerated for the second time, which started with the Afmiya wars and ended on independence.
The mood and subsequent mood periods have spoiled the paths of this historical act despite numerous policy errors, troubles and disruptions. Indian government under the RSS has rooted the most organized but deadly concept of "humble thousand years" of the Muslim rule that it does not even hurt itself. Today it provides a unique political slope to the imagined, corporate and violent Asafeei state riding on the head.
The same fascinating and bio-fictional concept of losing this progressive and sacular concept, which is making a lot more than a reality in India.
Classes of deprived and exploited sections support the fascinating concept, their disappointments are beneficial and they are used against their interests. R.S. Singh, Singh Pyarwar, BJP and Modi join this political process.
Just as the US is threatening to hit the deadly tragic presidency in Trump, in the same way, in the shadow of the neutral and ineffective Hindutva ideology, India will be less helpless until it comes from its current ideological point of view. No way to find out. The biggest disadvantage of Modi's spectacular success was that BJP could not succeed in a single seat in Kashmir.
Estimators of electoral achievements and failures in India once again embarrassed themselves. In 2014, she took maximum estimation for the election slogan of "Shining India". While this time, he made a very little guess on the result of the failure of the failed military action on election results, which was worst in the form of military conquest, which was the victim of violent and conspiracy Indian media.
According to Indian writer and analyst Deb, 'Modi's 5-year-old power has not taken any responsibility. Everything in India has spreadlessly. However, despite its milestone, the Indian majority, instead of performing in production or economic growth, has voted Modi again on the basis of majority of the likes and pre-violence. '
How did it happen Modi used sensitive aspects of Indian society for his own interest and presented the Indian emotional issue against the Muslim versus the Muslim and India as a key issue to India. He used to be very cleverly using the Plaudama and Balakot incident in his own interest.
In addition, the 21th Century Social Media and False News Technology has greatly enhanced the capabilities of the publication of public opinion and the ability to establish it as its own. According to the Debt, control over the middle class of Modi's India, provided support in this regard. At the same time, compared to the total amount given to the other 6 national parties, more than 12 times the amount was deposited in the BJP's Patna, and thus 93 per cent of the total corporate gutts are only part of the BJP. I came.'
The same type of critic comes true on Pakistan, America and other 'democratic' countries. Like India, these are not real democracy. These include corporate, praetorian plutocratic systems, representing the elected representatives and cabinet, editorial interests of the elite and elite, which facilitate facilitating and financing their election campaigns. And members do not represent the parliament or the constituency. These systems are not only the case of poorly developing democracies, but they are in a position of hideout dictatorship and 'deceptive' system in the democratic alignment.
What is the path of Pak-India relations now from here? Pakistan has two ideas on widespread basis for the victory of Modi. Near to some people, they see India as a corrupt part of India's mataata, which is now a difficult obstacle in the interpretation of dreams of becoming the dominant South Asia of India. So they will try to teach Pakistan a lesson in the strategic field. They will not leave any lesser and indefinite pressure on Pakistan by utilizing all available options globally and globally so that it can be subject to India's will.
Or alternately, more than a dozen Modi Modi can choose a few options for Pakistan, facing difficult situations, that can "encourage" to seduce Pakistan on the right direction. They can include non-destructive, subsequent regular negotiations and gradually involving multiple-way support options. In return, Modi from Kashmir (including the potential restoration of back channel talks and extremist activities on the LOC), terrorism (including completion of FTF terms and alleged terror structures, shelters and End of Services) and in the region including Afghanistan, you will expect a change in 'behavior' regarding 'respect' of Indian strategic interests. Modi will assure Pakistan that he should maintain 'balance' in his relationship between China and India, which explains the 'Context' of its involvement in the CP.
It is all agreed that the prime minister maintains peace with his position, on the occasion of the relationship with India, especially in recent conflict. It is expected to meet Modi during the Shanghai Cooperation Summit (SCO) in June. This meeting will be very important in the differences between the differences and the challenge of Chelgen, which can streamline the path of real-time and true relationship. Although this type of meeting, unusual and short, it will also need to be carefully prepared with political consultation in the country and with detailed consultation with New Delhi.
If Modi's embassy is strict and unacceptable, Pakistan should set a high example of the opposite of diplomatic diplomacy in India. If Modi demonstrates more flexibility, Pakistan should not be ashamed of looking for a long-term principle of relations.
No comments:
Post a Comment