Flare up rumors about Israeli attack on Iran before the U.S. elections

The media in Israel one after another, they note the possibility of a military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in the fall, even before the U.S. presidential elections on 6^th November. The newspaper «Yedioth Ahronoth» in an article titled "Barak and Netanyahu committed to attacking Iran in the fall," says that "military intervention is now more possible than ever," a claim comes just one day after the statements of Minister Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak , who described the possibility of "urgent". "If the [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu and Barak could decide for themselves, we unleashed an attack in early autumn, even before the U.S. elections to be held on November 6, " writes the Israeli newspaper classed as "very important fact that the two men are determined to take this decision. " "Yet no one official or military, or the circle of the Ministry of Defence, not even the president does not support the idea of an Israeli attack" underlines the story of «Yedioth Ahronoth» noting that the core of the Israeli political and military leadership undecided about the final decision and the point where he could take place this surgery. In the same wavelength and moves the newspaper «Haaretz» that an article reporting a warning of an Israeli official, who wished to remain anonymous, who believes that Israel now faces a greater risk than the eve of the war of 1967. Note that a few days ago, retired Israeli Major General Aharon Zeev Farkas told Channel 2 television that Israel "[attack Iran] is likely to happen soon, it may within weeks or two months," adding however that a possible military intervention should be "our last choice." Statements of Major became one days after the Ephraim Halevi, former head of secret services in the country, Mossad, implied in the newspaper «The New York Times» that an imminent Israeli military operation against Iran, saying: "If I was Iranian will be too afraid the next 12 weeks. " As is known the government of U.S. President Barack Obama has often proedopoiisei publicly and in secret contacts, the Israelis not to embark on such an undertaking, in any case not before the U.S. elections. Moreover it is very doubtful success of a sudden attack after Israeli F-16 have to travel great distances and will need to refuel in the air, and it is doubtful that they are completely destroyed are scattered and hidden dozens of meters below ground Iranian nuclear facilities.

Evidence of Iranian support for Assad Sends Iran elite fighters to Syria?

There are apparently new evidence that Iran is sending members of his elite troops to Assad's support to Syria.But the source of information is tricky. "Iran will not tolerate that the axis of the resistance to which Syria is very much is broken." It is only two days ago that the Iranian leaders Said Jalil said this sentence is.. Which means that Iran uses to make that threat, he did not saythe "axis of resistance" is essentially Iran, the Assad regime and the Lebanese Hezbollah - all three Shiite.From Iran's point of view they have to compete against powerful enemies. Rush around the predominantly Sunni Syrian rebels, who want to Assad, the Sunni Saudi Arabia and of course the Westare on this Thursday evidence been disclosed which are intended to show that Iran with its help for Assad has already gone far concern is that he is a battle-hardened unit members Assad sent.

Iranian opposition accuses her government

The People's Mujahedeen claimed that 48 Iranians who were on Friday taken captive by rebels in Syria, in fact, as claimed by the rebels, members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are - an Iranian paramilitary elite unit.Instead, Iran had shown the men as pilgrims on their way to a Shiite shrine in Damascus, under which would have retired Revolutionary Guards found -. So by chance, the People's Mojahedin want to have researched the report referred to the Revolutionary Guards in Iran forces for use in Syria recruit.The men were disguised as pilgrims to Syria, brought by the "culture and seed Alaeme services institution."This institute was founded by Hassan Ashtiani, the leader of the international force fighting the Revolutionary Guards, known as El-Quds Brigade.Members of the El-Quds Brigade were flown by private Iranian airlines to Damascus.The prisoners from Friday to belong to a force of 150 men who should be brought from Damascus to missions.but the two very different regimes - and secular Arab Syria and theocratic Persian and Iran - have their story many times against common allied opponents: the fight against Israel, for example.For this purpose, they supported both the Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestinian Hamas.Both feel threatened by the hegemony of the United States with fellow Sunni Saudi Arabia and try to - with limited success - to grow its influence in the region has not been.

Questionable, usually well informed source

Whether one can believe the MKO, her portrayal of current events, is controversial among experts.One must be careful, they would eventually bring about international opposition as an interest in Iran in disrepute, says Islamic scholar Udo Steinbach to FOCUS Online.However, the People's Mujahideen in the past had always been remarkably well informed about the internals of the Iranian government - for example over the nuclear program. He considers the information to be reasonable."The Iranian regime wants an end to Assad at least delay, if there is a change of power can not even prevent," says Steinbach, who led for 30 years, the German Orient Institute in Hamburg."This has to happen naturally covered.The al-Quds Brigade operates most likely in Syria, though not with great organizations. "Nevertheless, Steinbach also not say for sure whether the men were traveling as a fighter or a consultant.

Privacy: Google pays $ 22.5 million fine

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced Thursday an agreement with the internet group Google, who will pay a fine of 22.5 million to settle lawsuits related to the monitoring of users of Apple's web browser, Safari. On the scale of Google, which last month published a quarterly profit of $ 2.8 billion, this is a modest penalty, but the FTC said it represented in what concerns the amount record. According to the FTC, Google had hinted to users, wrongly, that it would install no "cookies", small spyware, or do not present their targeted advertising. The Wall Street Journal said in February that Google and other advertising companies were using special programming codes, hidden commands in Safari, to monitor and record the Internet surfing habits of users of the software, bypassing the preferences users who had enabled a feature to block "cookies". "In addition to the civil penalty, the decision (the FTC) also requires that Google will disable all cookies it would not install on the computers of Internet users," said the government agency, which noted that it began its investigation well before actual news reports. "Whether big or small, all companies must respect the decisions of the FTC and keep promises of confidentiality made to consumers, or they will end up paying much more than what would have cost compliance" with rules, commented the FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. The FTC said the agreement did not mean recognition of his wrongs by Google - a requirement "that we bring anything from a legal standpoint," argued one of its officials in a teleconference. In a statement, the California group noted that "the FTC focused on a help page for 2009, published more than two years before (the commitments made by Google in terms of confidentiality), and a year before Apple changes its policy on cookies. " "We edit and taken steps to remove browser cookies Apple ads, which did not contain personal information," added Google. This is not, far from it, the first time that Google is pinned on the topic of confidentiality, leading some to question the sincerity of its commitment to respecting the privacy of its users. "For us, it is disturbing that Google says he did not know," said the director of the office of consumer protection at the FTC, David Vladeck. "As a regulator, it is difficult to know which is worse for an answer, ¨ I did not know + +, or + I + deliberately," he added. Referring to the controversy caused by the interception of private data by cars participating in the Google Maps service, Mr. Vladeck noted: "the answer for Street View was + we do not realize what was happening + Here the answer is + + was not known. But a company like Google that stores personal information of hundreds of millions of people must do better, "he said. The FTC also noted that the fine was not intended to sanction the collection of data in itself, but the information provided to users who have been misled. James Kohm, responsible for the investigation of the FTC, said Google had until February 2014 to delete all cookies in question, the time for all sites hosting the software is visited by Internet users.

FACEBOOK: DISMISSED AFTER "LIKE" A PAGE

Faced with the rapid development of social networks, national legislation must adapt very quickly to new conceptions of individual freedoms enjoyed by Internet users. While Twitter is central to several court cases that challenge the notion of privacy of Internet users, Facebook is in turn involved in a legal debate in the United States. A "Like" on Facebook agrees there freedom of expression of the user? That was the question debated in Virginia where the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Facebook challenge a court decision in Newport News. In late 2009, the Sheriff of Hampton had decided to refer certain employees who had supported his opponent on Facebook during the local election campaign. These employees were quickly challenged their dismissal in court, whereas the fact of a message on Facebook Liker could not grounds for dismissal because it was within their right to freedom of expression guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. But the court of Newport News had rejected their argument, holding that a "Like" was " a poor position , "not enough" supported "to be constitutionally protected. A judgment strongly criticized by the ACLU and who consider Facebook meanwhile approve a message or comment on the social network is like " an election sign "that announces to the other members that "the user submits, or approves welcomes the content of which is well marked "and thus requires the protection of the Constitution. " This is a very important matter , "said counsel for the ACLU Kate Wood. " It is extremely important that the law is adapting to new technologies "and" First Amendment should protect anyone who expresses his opinion, whatever the chosen format , "she added.

An Afghan military uniform killed three U.S. soldiers

A man wearing military uniform infiltrated Afghan NATO troops today, killing three U.S. soldiers in southern Afghanistan. It is the third attack against coalition forces by the insurgency in a week. The spokesman of Taliban rebels, Qari Yousef Ahmadi, said the attacker is called Asadullah and was a member of the Afghan police. He said that from his position this man had helped U.S. forces to train local police. He also said that after the attack joined the insurgent forces. Ahmadi's assertion seems to be true because a military source said: "The murderer had a close relationship with U.S. soldiers because he invited them to dinner and shot them." It is the third attack against coalition military that makes NATO so far this week. On Tuesday, two Afghan dressed in army uniform killed a U.S. soldier and wounded two others in the province of Paktia in the east. On Thursday, two attempted take down a group of NATO forces against a military base in eastern Afghanistan, but failed. So far this year, 30 coalition soldiers have been killed in 20 similar attacks, compared to 11 attacks with 20 deaths the previous year. In 2007 and 2008 there were a total of four attacks with four deaths. This is an unusual year for Afghans, and their own forces-police and military, are taking over security gradually, on the grounds that international forces are leaving the country. It is expected that in 2014 there are no more foreign troops, except in a U.S. military base.

Horrific: Priest penis bitten 20 years old

Shocked residents are in Utah USA after the gruesome news that a priest bit his penis 20 year old, after he hit his mother and abused his sister!Let's take things from archiSymfona reportedly a Mormon priest Efri Guzman visited the 13 year old in her home last May and tried to kiss her and to approach sex. When he reached the house the 20 year old brother, the priest left. The girl did not report the incident immediately to the police, but when told that it was filed "friend of the family." A few months later, on August 2, the Efri repeated his visit, but when the girl's mother asked him to leave and he refused attacked blasted her blouse. Then the son of the family appeared but when he tried to remove him from his mother, Efri attacked him biting him in the penis over the pants he wore. The attack was very violent so young man may need to undergo surgery.

China repairs section of the Great Wall that fell after storms

China has begun to repair a stretch of the Great Wall in Hebei Province, north of the country, which fell after days of continuous rains, said on Thursday the local authorities. The accident occurred on Monday when strong currents of water from the mountains Dajingmen crushed the passage of the Great Wall in Zhangjiakou, said a district official of Shijiazhuang Qiaoxi. The experts found cleaning the stretch of 36 meters long and reinforced other sections loose to prevent further landslides. Cracks were also detected in other parts of the wall near the section that collapsed. The professionals in the protection of cultural relics are drawing up plans to repair the damaged areas. The stretch Dajingmen the Great Wall was built during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) and suffered years of erosion, which also contributed to the collapse, the experts commented. Natural disasters are also threatening the cultural heritage in the country, according to a separate statement released Thursday by the State Administration of Cultural Heritage. A storage facility of the National Museum in Beijing and an exhibit hall of the Provincial Museum of Gansu in western China, have been affected by recent storms that damaged eight valuable pieces of cultural relics, referred to the administration. The authority issued a circular asking local authorities to carry out inspections in units of cultural heritage, museums and warehousing affiliates in order to ensure the safety of staff and assets.